Emilio Nava vs Bu Yunchaokete Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jul at 12:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Nava vs B. Yunchaokete

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Yunchaokete
They have played 3 sets in total, with Emilio Nava winning 2 and Bu Yunchaokete winning 1. The last match between Emilio Nava and Bu Yunchaokete was at the Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos, 16-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 3-6 7-5 7-6(6).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nava | 1 |
| Yunchaokete | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos(07-16-25)
E. Nava vs B. Yunchaokete H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $696,545 | Career Prize Money | $688,765 |
| 59.66% (244-165) | Career Total W/L | 63.34% (197-114) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (6-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 30.77% (12-27) |
E. Nava vs B. Yunchaokete Match Preview:
- Nava has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 46.51% of points compared to Yunchaokete's 44.19% in recent months. How crucial is second serve efficiency? It often correlates with match outcomes.
- Return game statistics favor Nava, showing success in winning 47.18% of opponents' second serves, whereas Yunchaokete manages 43.76%.
- When returning first serves, Nava also holds a small advantage with 24.27% compared to Yunchaokete's 23.41%.
- Which player performs better under pressure? Yunchaokete excels by saving 58.85% of breakpoints, outpacing Nava's 53.61%.
- Nava displays superior overall performance, winning 63.1% of matches over the last year, while Yunchaokete has a 53.52% win rate.
- On their preferred surfaces, Yunchaokete shines on hard courts with a 71% win rate, compared to Nava's clay strength at 67%.
- Player level indicators suggest Nava dominates Challengers/ITF tournaments, boasting a 68.49% win rate, contrasting with Yunchaokete's 44.83% win rate on the Main tour.
- Nava faces relatively lower-ranked opponents often, with an average opponent rank of 257.19, whereas Yunchaokete's average is 158.37.
- Deciding set performance is a highlight for Nava, winning 54% of such sets, while Yunchaokete wins 35%.
- In converting break points, Nava is slightly more effective, achieving a 33.48% success rate compared to Yunchaokete’s 30.28%.
Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents distinct contrasts between Nava and Yunchaokete, particularly in second serve efficiency and return games where Nava has a minor advantage.
While Yunchaokete excels under pressure by saving more breakpoints, Nava demonstrates an overall stronger performance with better win rates and reliable deciding set outcomes.
Considering surface preferences, Nava's prowess on clay is significant, though surface adaptability might play a role given Yunchaokete's hard court success.
Overall, based on current trends and performance in key areas, Nava is more likely to emerge victorious in this tennis matchup.
Emilio Nava vs Bu Yunchaokete Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Nava vs B. Yunchaokete H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 17 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 3:2:23 | Average Match Time | 3:2:23 |
| 61% (69/113) | 1st Serve % | 58% (71/123) |
| 84% (58/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (53/71) |
| 41% (18/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (27/52) |
| 11% (1/9) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 35% (43/123) | Return Points Win % | 33% (37/113) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Nava Recent Matches Played
B. Yunchaokete Recent Matches Played

E. Nava vs B. Yunchaokete Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.66% (244/165) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.34% (197/114) |
| 56.67% (544/416) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.13% (434/276) |
| 51.85% (4881/4532) | Games Win/Loss | 54.15% (3702/3134) |
| 55.43% (97/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.04% (165/74) |
| 66.67% (114/57) | Clay Win/Loss | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 54.90% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.94% (18/16) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 0.54 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 2511 | Aces Total | 1614 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1176 | Total Double Faults | 456 |
| 1:37:31 | Average Match Time | 1:38:59 |
| 371.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 342.81 |
| 63% (17806/28476) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11588/19708) |
| 71% (12704/17806) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (8333/11588) |
| 51% (5460/10670) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (4265/8120) |
| 41% (1040/2513) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (808/1952) |
| 38% (10760/28508) | Return Points Win % | 39% (7804/20023) |
| 51.85% (14/13) | Slam W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Masters W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 42.31% (11/15) | Main Tour W/L | 44.74% (17/21) |
| 61.81% (157/97) | Challenger W/L | 65.08% (82/44) |
| 64.86% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 75.68% (84/27) |
| 60% (238/397) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (190/297) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 50% (87/174) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (50/109) |
| 59% (77/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (42/83) |
| 85% (233/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (204/172) |
| 15% (233/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (204/31) |
| 25% (176/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (106/23) |